Question: Have you ever wanted to be so
sure about something that it stopped you in your tracks? Kind of like a
deer staring into the lights of an oncoming vehicle. I am in that sort of
predicament. On the one hand I have the Scriptures which I read from on a
daily basis and the Spirit of God to lead me. On the other hand I have
this Church that basically says, "Just do what I say." I am at a
standstill. The one thing that really get to the crux of the whole issue
is authority. Did Christ give the church the ultimate authority in all
matters of doctrine and faith, or is it his will that each one of us
should be led by the Spirit of God?
Answer: You’re struggling between two choices: on one hand is
the Catholic claim to ultimate authority, on the other, the leading of the
Holy Spirit by the Scriptures.
This, however, is a false dilemma. For church authority and private
judgement are not enemies, and you do not have to choose one and oppose
the other. The alternative to the Roman claim to ultimate and infallible
authority (basically, "believe and do whatever the magisterium
says") is not
the leading of the Holy Spirit and private interpretations of the
Scriptures.
Many people hold this false notion that Protestantism champions the
"me-Bible-only" Lone Ranger mentality, which unfortunately is so
common among us. This problem is certainly not confined to Evangelical
circles. The same phenomenon is also seen among Catholics, in which case
the formula changes to "me-my-opinion " irrespective of what the
Church officially teaches. The individualistic attitude is not what we
find in the New Testament churches!
The Head of the Church commissions pastors to preach and teach and
explain the Word. Christ gives gifts to the church, including pastors and
teachers, whose job is it to teach and preach (cf Ephesians 4:11ff).
"Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove,
rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine" (2 Timothy 4:2).
"These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority"
(Titus 2:15). The picture which we don't find in the New Testament is of a
“church” made up of autonomous self-sufficient individualistic
Christians who do not see the need of teachers because they have the Bible
and the Holy Spirit.
The individual Christian is not alone in his endeavor to understand and
mature in the Word of God. The Lord gives us the service of pastors and
teachers to help us understand His Word, and we will be impoverished if we
ignore this God-given plan for His children. He calls Christians to join
in with other brothers and sisters in local assemblies to be spiritually
fed, supervised and ruled by elders (also known as pastor or bishops, 1
Peter 5:1,2; 1 Tim 5:17; Hebrews 13:7)
Two objections immediately comes to my mind:
-
How can evangelical pastors have any authority since they are not
infallible?
-
If I submit to the teaching ministry of the church, does that mean
that I loose my right to private judgement?
To the first statement, I reply: It is not necessary for someone to be
infallible to be authoritative. Our governments possess authority, but
they are not infallible! As a father you have authority over your children
to raise them up in the counsel and admonition of the Lord, yet, as you
are painfully aware, you are a fallible human being. You may make
mistakes, probably you have already committed quite a few, and yet you're
still the authoritative head of the family. What if your children say,
"Our dad is not infallible, therefore he has no real authority,
therefore we will not submit to him." Have you ever thought like that
vis-à-vis the evangelical pastors?
The very claim to infallibility is evidently false. It is a novel and
proud invention of the modern Roman Catholic Church. Ironically, a popular
Roman Catholic catechism in the middle of the nineteenth century by the
Rev Stephen Keenan denied the infallibility of the Pope:
Question: Must not Catholics believe the Pope in himself to be
infallible?
Answer: This is a Protestant invention; it is no article of the
Catholic faith; no decision of his can oblige, under pain of heresy,
unless it be received and enforced by the teaching body; that is, by the
bishops of the Church. (Keenan's Controversial Catechism, on
Protestantism Refuted and Catholicism Establish, by the Rev. Stephen
Keenan, Second Edition revised and enlarged, published in 1851 by C.
Dolman, 13 South Hanover Street, Edinburgh; and 61, New Bond Street,
London).
What was then an alleged “Protestant invention” was soon declared
to be a dogma by Vatican I and claimed to be a teaching “received from
the beginning of the Christian faith”!
Compare the proud claim of infallible papal authority to the attitude
of a Christian pastor. He is aware of the God-given authority to preach
the Word (Titus 2:15); yet he is also painfully aware of his own weakness.
He has taken the warning seriously, “My brethren, let not many of you
become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment. For
we all stumble in many things” (James 3:1,2). The faithful pastor
studies to show himself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be
ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of truth. Do not hold it against him
that he is humble enough to admit his fallibility.
What then of the notion of private judgement? Does the individual
Christian forfeit his privilege to study the Scriptures and to exercise
discernment when he submits to the pastoral and teaching ministry of the
church? No, not at all. On the contrary, the Lord and His apostles
constantly reasoned with the people from the Scriptures. The apostles did
not merely say, “Believe and obey what we’re teaching because we are
apostles.” The method they employed, as recorded in the Acts of the
Apostles and the epistles, is based on persuasion by reasonable argument
and appeal to the Scriptures.
This implies that it is not expected of the disciples to be blind
followers of their leaders. Christian pastors are eager to demonstrate
that the Christian faith is rooted in the Holy Scriptures. At the same
time,
disciples should exercise discernment, testing all things, searching the
Scriptures daily to see that the things taught by their pastors are true.
I am thankful for those who have taught me the Christian faith through
their sermons and writings, and especially for taking me to the
Scriptures, so that ultimately my faith would rest on the solid rock of the
Word of God.
The real choice is between one form of church authority and another. On
the one hand, we have the false claim of infallible authority by the
leaders of the Roman Church. They refuse to be accountable to the church
in general because they say that ordinary Christians cannot rightly interpret
the Bible. On the other hand, Christian pastors exercise teaching
authority while admitting that they too are liable to make mistakes. They
encourage ordinary Christians to test all things, including their
teaching, and to study the Scriptures for themselves.
The end result is this. The Catholic ultimately rests on the authority
of the Vatican leaders. “I believe because the Church teaches so
and so.” Having been convinced that the teaching of the church is
biblical, the Evangelical Christian says, “I believe because the
Bible teaches so and so.”