Question: What’s the use of having an infallible Bible
unless you have an infallible interpreter to give the correct meaning?
Answer: This is yet another argument designed to bolster the
authority of Rome and to undermine the authority of the Bible. For, as
you say, what’s the use of having an infallible Bible if we cannot
understand it correctly? Hence the need for an ‘infallible
interpreter,’ the Roman magisterium, which is supposedly infallible
(cannot make a mistake) and therefore consistently interprets God’s
Word correctly. The average Roman Catholic could blindly trust the
magisterium and keep his Bible closed on the shelf.
Evangelicals frankly admit that they are fallible. We can, and often
we do, make mistakes. Our teachers are fallible, and they too are liable
to make mistakes. Sometimes they disagree among themselves, and there is
a measure of error in the best Christian churches. We are not dissimilar from the early Christians in the apostolic
churches. Sometimes their leaders disagreed too (Acts 15:39), and there
was a measure of error and false doctrines in the churches of Colosse,
Galatia and Corinth.
Yet we, like the early Christians, also uphold the essential truth of
the Gospel. To be fallible is to be liable to error; it does
not mean that one must always be in error! We thank God that He uses weak and
fallible instruments – like our teachers and our fallible
understanding – to teach us His truth. Being aware of our limitations
should make us more diligent in our study of the Scriptures, and more
humble and willing to be corrected, thus becoming more mature in our understanding.
Despite the claim of an infallible magisterium, our Roman Catholic
friends are not better off. Some Catholics frankly admit that Catholic
bishops have been mistaken, and that there is a diversity of beliefs and
opinions among the Catholic people similar to the situation in the
Evangelical camp.
Even if the magisterium was infallible (in fact, it is not), the
Catholic is still caught up in a dilemma. If, as you argue, there is no
use for an infallible Bible if there isn’t an infallible magisterium,
then there isn’t much use for an infallible magisterium either. You
may not realize this, but your belief in the infallibility of the
magisterium is itself a fallible opinion. You may have been indoctrinated since
childhood or you may have studied the issue yourself and came to this
conclusion about the magisterium. Whatever the case may be, it is still your fallible
decision, your fallible belief. Also, Catholic doctrine is taught
to the laity by fallible priests, fallible teachers, and fallible
catechists. Their teaching may not accurately reflect the official
Catholic position. And finally, Catholic doctrine is received by the individual
who is also fallible and liable to misunderstand and misinterpret the
official teaching.
Protestants have no delusions about infallibility, and I hope that
many Catholics would come to realize this evident reality in
their church too.