Question: The Catholic Church teaches the
truth because the doctrines of Christ and the apostles have been preserved
through an unbroken line of Catholic bishops. All over the world, all
Catholic bishops can have their lineage of predecessors traced back to the
time of the apostles, something that is impossible in Protestant
denominations. What are your comments?
Answer: In Catholic theology, apostolic succession
is the line of bishops stretching back to the apostles. Apostolic
succession is supposedly the guarantee that the modern Catholic Church
teaches the pure doctrines of Christ.
Now, if this rule of succession guarantees doctrinal purity, why
can’t others also apply it also, say the Eastern Orthodox Church? They
too rightly claim apostolic succession, and yet they contradict the Roman
Church on the fundamental question of the infallibility and universal
jurisdiction of the bishop of Rome. Clearly something more than
‘apostolic succession’ is needed to know whether a given doctrine is
true or not.
Church leaders should teach faithful men, who in turn would teach
others, and hence the Gospel is transmitted from one generation to
another. “The things that you have heard from me among many witnesses,
commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also” (2 Timothy 2:2).
However, the mere lineal succession of bishops/elders/pastors does not
in itself guarantee the preservation and purity of the original message.
First of all, the bishops are not apostles, nor do they have the same
authority of the apostles. The apostles were a unique group of men who
were commissioned by Christ to lay down the foundation of the church. The
elders/bishops of the church are inferior to the apostles.
Moreover, the apostle Paul warned the bishops of the church of Ephesus
“that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not
sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking
perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves” (Acts 20:29,30).
Some of the “savage wolves” originated from among the
legitimate bishops of the church at Ephesus. They too would speak
“perverse things.” Clearly then, even though those bishops could
rightly claim “apostolic succession” (according to the Roman Catholic
concept), still their doctrines were false.
Historically, the priests, Levites and the religious leaders of Israel
were the "successors" of Moses and the prophets, yet by the time of
Christ, they were teaching all sorts of false doctrines and had filled the
house of Israel with leaven. It became necessary for the early Christians
to depart from them because they were not faithfully teaching the
doctrines of the Scriptures.
I hope that many Catholics will see the emptiness of the Catholic
bishops’ claim to infallible authority merely because of historical
lineage. They remind me of the Jewish leaders who were often bragging that
they had Abraham as their father. Do you remember how John the baptist rebuked
them, “And do not think to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our
father.’ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to
Abraham from these stones” (Matthew 3:9). Concerning these same successors of the
Patriarchs, Jesus warned His disciples to “take heed and beware of the
leaven - the doctrines - of the Pharisees and the Sadducees”
(Matthew 16:6).
This principle applies today as much as it ever did
before.