Church Fathers and Baptism
Question: Did the early Church
Fathers really believe that baptism washed away original sin?
Answer: This question is important because it has to do with
the ultimate authority upon which we rest our faith. We value
the teaching of the Church Fathers, but given that they were not
infallible and that they often contradicted each another, we must look for
a surer foundation for our faith. The ultimate criterion is the Word of
God. Even in apostolic times, errors quickly spread among true
Christian churches and the apostle Paul was amazed that they would so
quickly depart from the Gospel. He points them back to the Gospel he had
originally taught them and the teaching of the Scriptures. That is
what we should do also.
As a matter of historical fact, there was a general consensus among
the Fathers that baptism was the instrument of regeneration and washing
away of sin. That settles the question for the Roman Catholic, who is
also amazed that Evangelical Christians have the audacity to disagree with
the Fathers on this matter. It may come as a surprise that Catholics too
do not follow the practice of the early church in the administration of
this sacrament. For example it was common practice that the candidate was immersed three times,
whereas the modern Catholic rite consists of pouring water on the head.
Before baptism, the candidate was anointed with "oil of
exorcism" while the presbyter prayed, "Let all spirits flee
far away from you." Apart from the fact that there is no scriptural
warrant for this anointing, they were also mistaken in their belief that
this oil served for the remission of sins even before baptism:
Now this is blessed by the high priest for the remission of sins,
and the first preparation for baptism. For he calls thus upon the
unbegotten God, the Father of Christ, the King of all sensible and
intelligible natures, that He would sanctify the oil in the name of
the Lord Jesus, and impart to it spiritual grace and efficacious
strength, the remission of sins, and the first preparation for the
confession of baptism, that so the candidate for baptism, when he is
anointed may be freed from all ungodliness, and may become worthy of
initiation, according to the command of the Only-begotten (Apostolic
Constitutions, XLII)
During baptism, the candidates had to remove
their clothing and stand naked in the water. The newly baptized was not
allowed to take a bath for a whole week. We do not feel obliged to
follow the fathers in their unscriptural inventions, changing the simple
ordinance of Christ into a superstition, not to mention their disregard
for public decency. (See Tertullian, The Crown; St Hippolytus of Rome,
The Apostolic Tradition). These are the same people who insisted on
baptismal regeneration.
However, to their credit, we should note that there was an emphasis
in the early church on faith and repentance, so that the candidates of
baptism were thoroughly indoctrinated in Christian doctrine before they were actually baptized. What should we think
of a person
who, having learned about Jesus, the cross and the resurrection, repents
of his sins and believes in Christ for salvation? Do you think that he
would not be saved until he was baptized in water? I don’t think so
because the Bible everywhere teaches that those who believe in Jesus’
name are saved (Luke 7:50; John 20:31; Acts 10:43; 16:31; Romans 3:22,
25, 26, 28, 30, 4:5; Galatians 2:16; 3:24; Ephesians 2:8-9; Philippians
3:9, etc.).
The idea of baptismal regeneration is linked to infant baptism.
Though the Bible teaches that baptism should follow personal faith in
Christ, and though there is no conclusive scriptural evidence for
baptizing infants, yet this tradition gradually increased in popularity
until it became the common practice in the churches. The
teaching about baptism effecting salvation was erroneous but not fatal
because it was still linked to repentance and faith in Christ. But in
infant baptism, baptism was separated from personal faith. The baby,
though unable to believe, was supposedly cleansed from sin without even
knowing about it! One error leads to another. Who knows how many people
mistakenly think they are Christians simply because they were baptized
in infancy? But here too, I hope that later on many came to a personal
faith in Christ and were saved despite that false doctrine of baptismal
regeneration.
In brief, we must have the courage to return to the revealed truth of
the Bible even though our spiritual ancestors believed differently. They
were mistaken in this area. We are not disrespectful to the Church
Fathers, but our commitment to the ultimate authority of the Bible
compels us to be different. The consistent Biblical pattern is firstly,
the preaching of the Gospel, followed by faith, and finally the baptism
of believers. Their faith in Christ is the irrefutable evidence that
they are already born again before they enter the water of baptism.
"These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of
the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life" (1 John
5:13).
|